Monday, January 27, 2014

On Non-Binary Jewish Identities and the Future of Traditional Judaism

by Amram Altzman for newvoices.org

I have a hard time answering the question, “So how do you identify? Like, Jewish-ly?”

Jewish Identities On the one hand, I grew up in a Modern Orthodox home and attended Modern Orthodox schools since kindergarten, but, for most of my life so far, was part of a haredi community in southern Brooklyn. On the other hand, I’m studying at the flagship institution of Conservative Judaism in the United States, and, when given the option, often find myself in egalitarian prayer communities as opposed to the traditional, Modern Orthodox communities in which I was raised. And, even if I’m praying in a traditional Conservative community on campus, I am still committed to Modern Orthodoxy as a theology.

So, the short answer is that I don’t have an answer. I am all of those things at the same time, and somehow manage to thrive. The long answer, however, is that I see three different aspects to my identity: my beliefs, my personal practices, and my communal practices. Ultimately, those are the three that are going to inform how I act as a Jew, and each has its own label.

The first is my theology. I identify most closely with Modern Orthodox or Open Orthodox Judaism. I believe in the validity of the Jewish legal, or Halakhic system, but also see a reasonable amount of flexibility to operate and innovate within the given framework of Jewish legal tradition. (For more on this, see Rabbi Avraham Weiss’s essay, “Open Orthodoxy! A Modern Orthodox Rabbi’s Plea.”) Modern Orthodoxy demands a commitment to the Halakhic framework that has been followed by generations of Jews that allows me to see the value in preserving said framework. At the same time, however, it also charges me to innovate within that same framework to create spaces for Jews who previously were excluded from the Orthodox community, either because of their gender or their sexuality, or a number of other reasons.

Indeed, this is possibly because to me, Modern Orthodoxy can only be seen as a belief system, not as a set of practices and rituals. Modern Orthodoxy dictates that we straddle the line between tradition and modernity, and see the spiritual from the mundane. How we do that, however, is up to us to decide, which means that there are so many ways for a Modern Orthodox-identified Jew to exhibit his or her Modern Orthodoxy.

 Continue reading.

Monday, January 20, 2014

What Limmud Can Teach Us

A Spirit of Youthful Volunteerism Sorely Lacking in America


By Jane Eisner for The Jewish Daily Forward

LimmudThe fourth and final night of the massive conference known as Limmud UK coincided with Christmas, but you’d never know it in the auditorium where thousands gathered on the campus of the University of Warwick in Coventry, several hours from London. Instead, the focus was on the two men who oversaw the annual marathon of non-stop classes, lectures, debates, dancing, prayers, performances and late-night sessions at the bar, all in service of self-styled Jewish learning.

Richard Verber and Oliver Marcus stood at a podium and did what co-chairs do: Thanked the very many people who made this Limmud the largest and, observers said, the most successful since the idea was launched in 1980. Two thousand, six hundred participants attended 1,102 sessions offered by 451 presenters from around the globe – an organizational challenge for even the most seasoned conference coordinators.

But Verber is 29 years old. Marcus is 27.

And they chaired Limmud in their spare time.

Limmud is an avowedly volunteer and egalitarian effort, and overwhelmingly young. One of the people in charge of the optional Shabbat weekend before the conference began on December 22 is only 25. One of the people overseeing the massive undertaking of feeding kosher food to thousands three times a day is the same age.

This was my first time at Limmud UK, and I was hugely impressed by the volunteer leadership of the under 30 crowd; I saw the same thing on a smaller scale at Limmud New York last year.

The contrast between this approach and the one taken by so many youth-engagement efforts in the American Jewish community is profound. Here we offer free books to Jewish toddlers even if their parents can afford to buy them; free trips to Israel through Taglit Birthright; free homey meals (and sometimes liquor) at Chabad houses on campuses across the country; thousands of dollars in grants and subsidies to young Jews with the inkling of a novel idea.

 Continue reading.



Monday, January 13, 2014

Backlash Against Israel Boycott Throws Academic Association on Defensive

By PETER SCHMIDT | THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION in he New York Times

ASABoycott backlashWith its recent vote to boycott Israel’s higher-education institutions to protest the country’s treatment of Palestinians, the American Studies Association has itself become the target of widespread criticism and ostracism. It has gone from relative obscurity to prominence as a pariah of the United States higher-education establishment, its experience serving as a cautionary tale for other scholarly groups that might consider taking a similar stand on the Middle East.

In sharp contrast to the international campaign for an academic and cultural boycott of Israel, which had been slow to gain a foothold in the United States, the campaign to rebuke the American Studies Association has spread rapidly since the group’s mid-December boycott vote. The presidents of more than 80 United States colleges have condemned the vote.

“Such boycotts threaten academic speech and exchange, which it is our solemn duty as academic institutions to protect,” Carolyn A. Martin, president of Amherst College, said in a statement posted on the university’s website. Nearly all of the presidents’ statements have similarly denounced the boycott as impeding the flow of ideas. Several have cited specific collaborations or exchanges with Israeli universities as evidence of their institutional commitment to maintaining strong relations with Israel.

At least five institutions — Bard College, Brandeis University, Indiana University, Kenyon College and Pennsylvania State University at Harrisburg — have withdrawn from A.S.A. membership.

As of last week, the boycott also had been denounced by three of the United States’ most prominent higher-education organizations: the American Association of University Professors, the American Council on Education and the Association of American Universities. “Such actions are misguided and greatly troubling, as they strike at the heart of academic freedom,” said the American Council on Education’s president, Molly Corbett Broad.

 Continue reading.

Monday, January 6, 2014

The Jewish Roots Of Nablus - Shechem

By F. M. Loewenberg for jewishmag.com
Today no one thinks of Nablus (Nablus) or Shechem (as it is known in Hebrew) as a Jewish city. In fact, many consider that it is the most hostile of all Arab cities on the West Bank. But this has not always been so. In the past, especially in Biblical times, it played a vital role in Jewish history and many important events took place in this city.

ShechemShechem is a very old city whose origins can be dated back to a period before the arrival of the Israelites. It is mentioned in two Egyptian inscriptions that are dated to the 19th century BCE. Rashbam postulated that it was named after the king of the city, that is, it is the city of Shechem. (Genesis 33:18). It was only after the Romans rebuilt the city that they called it Neapolis, the Greek name for New City, which the Arabs corrupted to Nablus.

Shechem in the days of the Patriarchs

Shechem was the first city that Abraham encountered when he travelled from Horon to the Promised Land. The Lord appeared to him at the Tree (or Plain) of Moreh and said to him, "To your seed I will give this land." In response to this promise he built an altar and offered sacrifices to the Lord (Genesis 12:5-7).

When Abraham's grandson Jacob returned from twenty years of exile in Padan Aram, Shechem was also the first city that he encountered in Canaan. Since he did not wish to stay with the local idol worshippers, Jacob bought a homestead in the city and pitched his tent there. Like his grandfather, Jacob also built an altar to worship the Lord who had protected him all along his travels (Genesis 33:18-20).

During the time that Jacob and his family lived in Shechem, his daughter Dinah was raped by Shechem son of Hamor, the son of the local tribal chief. The young man liked Dinah so much that he persuaded his father to obtain Jacob's consent to marry her. Jacob's sons agreed to this marriage on condition that all the men of Shechem circumcise themselves. Dinah's brothers Shimon and Levi took advantage of their temporary disability after the circumcision to kill all of them (Genesis 34:1-31). Since Jacob feared the reaction of the other Canaanite tribe, he hurriedly left Shechem for Beth-El (Genesis 35:1-5). But his attachment to Shechem continued in later years.

Years later, while living in far-away Hebron, Jacob sent his sons to graze his sheep in Shechem - presumably because he still owned pasture land there. Subsequently he sent his beloved son Joseph to check on the brothers. Joseph obeyed his father, but once he found his brothers he became the victim of their hatred and found himself sold as a slave to Egypt (Genesis 37:12-28).

Continue reading.